El pueblo unido jamás será vencido
Mar. 19th, 2008 09:58 am[adapted from a post by
lvs2read with permission]
So, I don't know how much everyone's been following the latest brouhaha here in LJ-land, but here's some links for those who might be interested:
First, LJ decides to eliminate Basic Accounts without telling current users so in the latest news post:
http://news.livejournal.com/106731.html?thread=68451051
Then, someone discovers that LJ is filtering their 'popular interests' list:
http://stewardess.livejournal.com/287615.html?format=light
http://stewardess.livejournal.com/287615.html?format=light
Then, someone else calls for a one-day strike of LJ:
http://stewardess.livejournal.com/288147.html?thread=5877907#t5877907
http://beckyzoole.livejournal.com/394838.html
http://beckyzoole.livejournal.com/395310.html
http://beckyzoole.livejournal.com/395125.html
ruric also posted a good analysis of why erasing Basic Accounts makes little sense, even with the (disdainful) arguments put forward by Anton Nosik (who works for SUP though I'm unclear under what title).
I've been, generally speaking, failing to get truly upset at LJ for the way they've been wanking us around (and I don't deny they have, I think they've been making awful and EXTREMELY problematic choices), though I can't really explain why. I've also been VERY uncomfortable with the automatic anti-Russian backlash there was when SUP's takeover was announced, which means I am STILL uncomfortable with any comment I see suggesting 'I told you' because the original statement was based in unjustified xenophobia and so to validate it like that is just plain problematic.
Anyway. The decision to take away Basic Accounts, however, is really bothering me. I hold three accounts at LJ and all three are paid accounts - though one of them I haven't paid myself in a while now (the other two is because I'm weak when it comes to icons and RPing) - but the basic accounts are really important to me. I want to have the possibility of free use of LJ, even if I don't use that opportunity. It's a matter of principle, absolutely, I want anyone who wants to blog on LJ to have that possibility and not have to be burdened by ads if they don't want to, and can't afford a paid account. I want my financial contribution to LJ to be my decision, not something I was forced into.
In terms of business, I think it says a lot about your ethics and the quality of your service when you offer viable free service (basic accounts might not have many add-ons and options but they work as well as any other accounts and you're not excluded from participating in anything), and your users choose to pay anyway. It's sign of a good, healthy business, and maybe more importantly - it's the right thing to do.
Re: the strike, you can expect not to hear anything from me on LJ on Friday GMT.
EDIT: Brad, the creator of LJ, posts about the decision to get rid of Basic Accounts, and makes a very good point about content and networking and community as the base of LJ's health.
"The paid users, while minimal, paid enough to keep the site running, and brought in enough revenue to keep growing the site, and paid our salaries. The free users, while not paying, were extremely valuable because they produced the content that the paying users were there to consume. You know, the whole network effect thing?"
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So, I don't know how much everyone's been following the latest brouhaha here in LJ-land, but here's some links for those who might be interested:
First, LJ decides to eliminate Basic Accounts without telling current users so in the latest news post:
http://news.livejournal.com/106731.html?thread=68451051
Then, someone discovers that LJ is filtering their 'popular interests' list:
http://stewardess.livejournal.com/287615.html?format=light
http://stewardess.livejournal.com/287615.html?format=light
Then, someone else calls for a one-day strike of LJ:
http://stewardess.livejournal.com/288147.html?thread=5877907#t5877907
http://beckyzoole.livejournal.com/394838.html
http://beckyzoole.livejournal.com/395310.html
http://beckyzoole.livejournal.com/395125.html
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I've been, generally speaking, failing to get truly upset at LJ for the way they've been wanking us around (and I don't deny they have, I think they've been making awful and EXTREMELY problematic choices), though I can't really explain why. I've also been VERY uncomfortable with the automatic anti-Russian backlash there was when SUP's takeover was announced, which means I am STILL uncomfortable with any comment I see suggesting 'I told you' because the original statement was based in unjustified xenophobia and so to validate it like that is just plain problematic.
Anyway. The decision to take away Basic Accounts, however, is really bothering me. I hold three accounts at LJ and all three are paid accounts - though one of them I haven't paid myself in a while now (the other two is because I'm weak when it comes to icons and RPing) - but the basic accounts are really important to me. I want to have the possibility of free use of LJ, even if I don't use that opportunity. It's a matter of principle, absolutely, I want anyone who wants to blog on LJ to have that possibility and not have to be burdened by ads if they don't want to, and can't afford a paid account. I want my financial contribution to LJ to be my decision, not something I was forced into.
In terms of business, I think it says a lot about your ethics and the quality of your service when you offer viable free service (basic accounts might not have many add-ons and options but they work as well as any other accounts and you're not excluded from participating in anything), and your users choose to pay anyway. It's sign of a good, healthy business, and maybe more importantly - it's the right thing to do.
Re: the strike, you can expect not to hear anything from me on LJ on Friday GMT.
EDIT: Brad, the creator of LJ, posts about the decision to get rid of Basic Accounts, and makes a very good point about content and networking and community as the base of LJ's health.
"The paid users, while minimal, paid enough to keep the site running, and brought in enough revenue to keep growing the site, and paid our salaries. The free users, while not paying, were extremely valuable because they produced the content that the paying users were there to consume. You know, the whole network effect thing?"