Against nature... not!!!
May. 9th, 2004 12:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
greenie_breizhAm just annoyed right now at gay people in France piquetting some random place because some religious figure said that it was ironic the same people that fight against GMOs on grounds of it being unnatural would fight for homosexuality's acceptance.
And what do gay people respond? They protest with signs saying "against nature and proud to be"! WTF!!!!!!! I mean, HELLO. First of all, it's not against nature since it exists and it's not a problem in nature. I have a huge problem with those signs being used. Way to try and be accepted. Second, I'm sorry, but comparing GMOs and homosexuals in the first place was a bit of an stretch. *sigh* I think I'm gonna clash with those gay organizations much more at home than I do here.
On a nicer note, Boston's mayor apparently said he didn't want the 1913 law, which has never really been enforced for heterosexual couples, to be enforced for gay couples, starting in 8 days. Whiiiz. I need to figure out whether I'll take personal time and stuff.
And what do gay people respond? They protest with signs saying "against nature and proud to be"! WTF!!!!!!! I mean, HELLO. First of all, it's not against nature since it exists and it's not a problem in nature. I have a huge problem with those signs being used. Way to try and be accepted. Second, I'm sorry, but comparing GMOs and homosexuals in the first place was a bit of an stretch. *sigh* I think I'm gonna clash with those gay organizations much more at home than I do here.
On a nicer note, Boston's mayor apparently said he didn't want the 1913 law, which has never really been enforced for heterosexual couples, to be enforced for gay couples, starting in 8 days. Whiiiz. I need to figure out whether I'll take personal time and stuff.
