It sucks because if we were a little more open about other sexual acts, if we didn't limit our understanding of sex to intercourse (with anything else "leading up" to this one thing, everything else being a lesser form of sex, if sex at all), I think our teens could learn to explore their own sexual desires in much safer and healthier ways (and not just teens, actually!). If this gets rid of the “technical” virgins I’m all for it. Way to miss the point, ladies.
I'm not sure you might think that we would need to have explicit discussions of sexual acts at all to do an anti-homophobia workshop? Also a real question, not a rhetorical one. :) I've been doing this so long that I kind of forget what it looks like from the outside, if that makes any sense. :) So I wasn’t sure one way or the other (I’ve never witnessed an anti-homophobia workshop, or known anyone who has IRL), and you just answered my question! Thanks for that
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-12-20 11:34 am (UTC)It sucks because if we were a little more open about other sexual acts, if we didn't limit our understanding of sex to intercourse (with anything else "leading up" to this one thing, everything else being a lesser form of sex, if sex at all), I think our teens could learn to explore their own sexual desires in much safer and healthier ways (and not just teens, actually!).
If this gets rid of the “technical” virgins I’m all for it. Way to miss the point, ladies.
I'm not sure you might think that we would need to have explicit discussions of sexual acts at all to do an anti-homophobia workshop? Also a real question, not a rhetorical one. :) I've been doing this so long that I kind of forget what it looks like from the outside, if that makes any sense. :)
So I wasn’t sure one way or the other (I’ve never witnessed an anti-homophobia workshop, or known anyone who has IRL), and you just answered my question! Thanks for that