Sorry, that should have read - 'If a man strikes first and a woman strikes back, or a woman strikes first and a man strikes back, I consider those symmetrical.' The key here is that gender of the aggressor is irrelevant. Hitting first would not be symmetrical with hitting back.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 12:23 am (UTC)'If a man strikes first and a woman strikes back, or a woman strikes first and a man strikes back, I consider those symmetrical.'
The key here is that gender of the aggressor is irrelevant. Hitting first would not be symmetrical with hitting back.